🔗 Share this article

Just 48 hours before the NYC mayoral election, Michael Lange issued a significant forecast – going beyond who would win overall, but block by block. The analyst, a political analyst born and raised in New York City, has spent more than ten years in progressive politics and has become a kind of local celebrity this year for his deep dives into city data and polling.

He released his extremely precise forecast map – accurately predicting that Zohran Mamdani would win although missing Andrew Cuomo’s solid showing – on his newsletter, his platform. Lange has a flair for clever terms. He pointed out, as an example, the divide between the progressive stronghold, stretching from one neighborhood to Bushwick to Astoria, where he predicted (correctly) that the left-wing candidate would triumph by huge margins, and the conservative-leaning zone on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. There, “the Free Press and financial newspapers surpass the New York Times” in audience and most voters leaned toward Cuomo, campaigning as a moderate alternative.

Election Night Patterns and Unexpected Results

What was your election night?

It was necessary because they were adding around 200,000 votes into the system frequently! I was actually a little nervous initially: Mamdani led the early vote by a dozen percentage points, but came large groups of votes that came in later and his lead dropped from 12 to 8%. I was worried.

You know, there was a world in which yesterday turned out kind of poorly for Mamdani, in which the opponent would have essentially increasing his support from the Democratic primary. However Mamdani gained 500,000 votes to his primary coalition, and this was critical why he succeeded. He went out and greatly broadened his base from the first round.

Coalition Building

How did the mayor-elect gain those extra votes from?

He built the alliance that the left long aimed for: diverse racially, youthful, tenants and it’s people facing cost pressures. He improved considerably with Black and Hispanic voters, everyday New Yorkers, compared to the earlier election. Plus he boosted his base of left-leaning activists, young leftists, and immigrant groups. Victory required without making those significant inroads.

He built the coalition that the left always wanted to build: diverse, young, renters and residents struggling with costs

There were also a number of Trump/Mamdani voters – is this significant?

It is a real thing, limited to Hispanic laborers, Asian communities and Muslims. Voters in immigrant strongholds that supported Trump previously backed the progressive this year. But it’s not that he was winning over white working-class voters and Trump loyalists.

Turnout and Effects

A major development of the night was the sky-high participation. Who did that help?

Both sides. Participation was significantly higher than anticipated. I thought we might go over two million, but it’s closer to 2.3 million – that is a huge number of participants. There was a substantial anti-Mamdani block, energized, but his supporters was equally driven, and that sufficed to secure victory.

You forecasted he’d exceed half the ballots. Is he likely for that?

Right now you would say he’s favored to get over 50%. He has just over 50% but remain around 200,000 votes uncounted at that time. So it’s not it’s definitive, but I think probable, and I hope he does so afterwards none can claim Sliwa was a spoiler.

GOP Decline

Curtis Sliwa, the Republican candidate, was another surprise. His support completely collapsed.

He lost any district in any borough. Not even one neighborhood in Staten Island, similar to an highly conservative area. That really was unexpected. The independent kept very white areas, affluent zones and devout communities, and plus gained many conservatives on Staten Island who had a strong turnout. I believe occurred a lot of tactical voting by GOP voters. This happened before Trump endorsed for Cuomo, but it assisted. It could have even turned the tide if Mamdani’s coalition failed to expand.

The “Commie Corridor”

What about your much mentioned left-wing base – did backing for the candidate dominant in those parts of Brooklyn and Queens?

I think there was a little dilution of the commie corridor in some areas like Astoria or Greenpoint that have older Caucasian residents. There, for example, the property owners and residents supported Cuomo. Thus there existed some opposition. However overall, largely the commie corridor is another huge reason why Mamdani prevailed – he scored between high percentages in specific neighborhoods.

Community Support

In the lead-up to the election we reported on whether Mamdani was making inroads with the community. Is there any suggestion that he did?

There are areas with a lot of non-religious and left-inclined voters – like specific locales – where he performed strongly. But in the wealthy Jewish communities like the Upper East Side, his Middle East stance definitely mattered there. Likewise in the moderate communities including Queens neighborhoods, or Bronx areas – they all leaned the independent. And also, there are Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe in southern Brooklyn, who were strongly Cuomo. So I don’t know if there were major surprises on this one, but Mamdani retained more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and including sections of the another locale with large leads.

Political Impact

Has Mamdani rewritten what New York represents in politics? Will the progressive base become a launch pad for progressive contenders?

Yes, it’s not accidental that some of the biggest political leaders from the left come from a few areas in the boroughs. I’m sure that we’ll see additional examples – candidates will come from these areas to be elevated nationally.

However I believe that every city in the US can have their own commie corridor. Urban places are the centers of progressive influence in America – since youth reside there, people rent and they are places where individuals struggle by the disparities we face.