🔗 Share this article

Nicolas Cage is likely the ideal choice for a daring horror film focused on the biblical figure, however not for the motivations certain audiences might assume. In reality, the star doesn't actually portray Jesus in the new film: his character is referred to only as a craftsman. He is cast as a father figure within this narrative, attempting to maintain his religious convictions while his son (acted by Noah Jupe), their adolescent adopted son, begins to show divine powers. The explanation it’s difficult to envision another leading star playing this part is that while the role becomes stricken with various difficulties, the actor seems practically moving confident that this murky, bleak little movie is worth his time.

Cage's Latest Career Choices

Cage has been spending those years more judiciously recently. He still does more films than the majority of regular audiences will ever see — for instance, were you informed that the man has filmed three different cowboy movies recently? — yet he also adds esteemed critically acclaimed roles like one recent hit, Pig, and Longlegs. The Carpenter’s Son seems like one of those, because it’s genre-adjacent, potentially provocative, and takes a exaggerated premise quite seriously.

Movie's Plot and Handling

Unfortunately, filmmaker Lotfy Nathan does not justify viewer engagement. The film starts from a engagingly rootless place, marketed as based on an obscure religious text about Christ’s childhood. The Carpenter, the maternal figure, and their son relocate frequently, afraid of religious persecution or doubt regarding their son's unusual abilities. “Disaster trails us,” The Carpenter gloomily remarks. This persists when dark forces focus on the household in their latest settlement, getting a jump-start on that familiar Biblical temptation for the youth.

Occasionally, the film echoes an demonic possession-type possession movie, except that not one of the lead characters are directly possessed. On the contrary, they are increasingly alienated from one another, as these entities infect a resident female (Isla Johnston, named an outsider) that The Boy connects to, and presents each character unsettling premonitions of a dark tomorrow. The Carpenter notably grapples with his position in the narrative, at times scolding the boy he can’t fully understand.

Discussion and Care

The subject matter is apt to invite debate, and Nathan treats it with a lot of sensitivity — too much, maybe. The idea of a adolescent facing his destined offering and lured by mysterious forces is indeed frightening, but the filmmaker may be hesitant regarding looking exploitative and eager to indicate his aims, so he often retreats into darkly ominous visuals. The roles brood incessantly — FKA Twigs, who demonstrated real promise in the 2024 Crow remake, interestingly — surrenders her role to her religious attire, occasionally interrupted by a few gnarly horror imagery.

The Star's Performance and Movie's Weaknesses

Meanwhile, Cage toy with just the sort of overacting that those who enjoy his campier roles might be looking for. There is a moment (also included) in previews where he erupts and shouts “My belief is broken!” Should such of theatrical release is a component of your biblical thriller, perhaps a more boldly ridiculous method would be more effective of his eagerness to be extreme when necessary. On the other hand, The Carpenter’s Son echoes the less successful low-budget films the actor filmed through much of the 2010s — excluding the campy action films instead the dramas and paranormal movies that often seem intriguing, and usually have a few choice actor's highlights, but finally come across like, well, cheap home video fare.

Honestly, a number of those, while less ambitious, were more entertaining overall. This is when I must break my personal rule, not faith-based but work-oriented: Years back, an admired senior convinced me to remove words like “monotonous” or “lifeless” from my analytical lexicon. These words express scant except a personal and vaguely expressed impatience, disengaging from the duty of vibrantly communicating the mental and feeling of watching an individual production. It's hard to express tedium without seeming uninteresting yourself. It's just as unclear as labeling a movie “notable.” “Elaborate,” essentially.

Yet, I acknowledge, I felt uninterested during much of the film. To the movie’s non-exploitative credit, it is a churchy kind of stultification, not for The Carpenter’s Son is preachy, but because it demands a kind of patient acceptance to sit through it. Eventually in the beginning, this feature enters a repetitive rhythm of simmering anguish, and never really